M/S. NAVJIVAN MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, SURAT vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - MS HETAL G PATEL( — SCA/7205/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240345852026
Filing Number
SCA/14601/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
SCA/7205/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
53-DB - TAX MATTERS - FINANCE ACT ( 53 )
Sub-Category
1-DB - TAX MATTERS - FINANCE ACT - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS - DIRECT TAX ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. NAVJIVAN MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, SURAT
Adv. MR. S S IYER(
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - MS HETAL G PATEL(
-
2.MEMBER (GST,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX)
Adv. MS HETAL G PATEL(
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE,SURAT
Adv. MS HETAL G PATEL(
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
529-For Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia , Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF
Case Summary - SCA/7205/2026 M/S. Navjivan Motors Private Limited filed a special civil application against the Union of India and GST authorities. The High Court of Gujarat, on 08/06/2026, adjourned the matter to 29/06/2026 following a leave note filed by the petitioner's advocate. No substantive order on merits was passed in this adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7205/2026
Case Summary - SCA/7205/2026 M/S. Navjivan Motors Private Limited filed a special civil application against the Union of India and GST authorities. The High Court of Gujarat, on 08/06/2026, adjourned the matter to 29/06/2026 following a leave note filed by the petitioner's advocate. No substantive order on merits was passed in this adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts