KANUBHAI BECHARBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - null( — SCA/7468/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240339182026
Filing Number
SCA/14337/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
SCA/7468/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
331-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 331 )
Sub-Category
1313-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - NON-USE OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS AND FORFEITURE OF AGRICULTURAL LAND/TAKING OVER OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRICULTURAL LAND FOR NON-USE OF THE AGRICULTURAL LAND (S.65) ( 1313 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANUBHAI BECHARBHAI PATEL
Adv. MR. JAIMIN R DAVE(
-
2.,MS MANVI A DAMLE(
-
3.,MS MANVI A DAMLE(
-
4., ,MS HIRVA R DAVE(
-
5.,MS MANVI A DAMLE(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - null(
-
2.COLLECTOR,VADODARA
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. MayeeView PDF
In SCA/7468/2026, the Gujarat High Court issued notice to the State of Gujarat and the Collector, Vadodara on petitioner Kanubhai Becharbhai Patel's special civil application. The notice is returnable on 02.07.2026, with the AGP waiving service on behalf of respondents and direct service permitted for respondent No. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7468/2026
In SCA/7468/2026, the Gujarat High Court issued notice to the State of Gujarat and the Collector, Vadodara on petitioner Kanubhai Becharbhai Patel's special civil application. The notice is returnable on 02.07.2026, with the AGP waiving service on behalf of respondents and direct service permitted for respondent No. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts