KHALIDHUSSAIN HAIDERBHAI CHAUHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/7170/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240336632026
Filing Number
SCA/14265/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
SCA/7170/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
331-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 331 )
Sub-Category
1308-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1308 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHALIDHUSSAIN HAIDERBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. MR NV GANDHI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.CITY MAMLATDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
4.DY. MAMLATDAR (E-DHARA) VATVA, AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. MayeeView PDF
Case Summary: SCA/7170/2026 In this Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court, the court issued notice to the respondents (State of Gujarat and district officials) returnable on 30.06.2026. The AGP waived service on behalf of respondents, and direct service was permitted for respondent nos. 3 and 4. The case was adjourned pending filing of affidavit-in-reply before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7170/2026
Case Summary: SCA/7170/2026 In this Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court, the court issued notice to the respondents (State of Gujarat and district officials) returnable on 30.06.2026. The AGP waived service on behalf of respondents, and direct service was permitted for respondent nos. 3 and 4. The case was adjourned pending filing of affidavit-in-reply before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts