RUPALBHAI JASHVANTBHAI NAYAK vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/6813/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227, 14, 16. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240334172026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
SCR.A/19319/2026
Filing Date
29-04-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/6813/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1871-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - MAINTENANCE ( 1871 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUPALBHAI JASHVANTBHAI NAYAK
Adv. MR ASHOK N PARMAR(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
SANGITABEN RUPALBHAI NAYAK AND DAUGHTER OF VASUBHAI FUGALABHAI AHIR
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
MINOR PRUTHABEN RUPALBHAI NAYAK
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
MINOR TAKSH RUPALBHAI NAYAK
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
3600-FRESH MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 17-06-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: SCR.A/6813/2026 In this maintenance recovery case, the Gujarat High Court issued notice returnable on 17.06.2026. The court found that the wife's recovery application seeking Rs. 2,48,000 (July 2023–January 2026) exceeded the one-year statutory limitation under Section 144(3) BNSS, 2023. Since the applicant had already deposited Rs. 91,000 with overlapping coverage, the court prohibited coercive action against the applicant pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCR.A/6813/2026 In this maintenance recovery case, the Gujarat High Court issued notice returnable on 17.06.2026. The court found that the wife's recovery application seeking Rs. 2,48,000 (July 2023–January 2026) exceeded the one-year statutory limitation under Section 144(3) BNSS, 2023. Since the applicant had already deposited Rs. 91,000 with overlapping coverage, the court prohibited coercive action against the applicant pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts