PARTH NARANBHAI RATHOD vs KRUTI PARTH RATHOD Advocate - MR BRIJESH K RAMANUJ( — FA/2095/2026
Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19. Status: 182-For Final Hearing. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240328982026
Filing Number
FA/13882/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
FA/2095/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
24-DB - FIRST APPEAL - FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984 ( 24 )
Sub-Category
854-DB - FIRST APPEAL - FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984 - MISCELLANEOUS ( 854 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARTH NARANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. MR DARSHIT M KAMDAR(
Respondent(s)
-
1.KRUTI PARTH RATHOD Advocate - MR BRIJESH K RAMANUJ(
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice R.m.chhaya,honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. VoraView PDF
Summary: In First Appeal No. 2095/2026 between Parth Naranbhai Rathod and Kruti Parth Rathod, the High Court of Gujarat admitted the appeal and directed the Registry to call for the record from the lower court. The Civil Application for Stay (No. 1/2026) was adjourned to 10.07.2026. The caveator's advocate was absent during both hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice R.m.chhaya,honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora
-
08-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora , Honourable Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FA/2095/2026
Summary: In First Appeal No. 2095/2026 between Parth Naranbhai Rathod and Kruti Parth Rathod, the High Court of Gujarat admitted the appeal and directed the Registry to call for the record from the lower court. The Civil Application for Stay (No. 1/2026) was adjourned to 10.07.2026. The caveator's advocate was absent during both hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts