GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs URMILADEVI RAMBABU SING @ SINH Advocate - null( — FA/2317/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act-1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240323012026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
FA/13644/2026
Filing Date
27-04-2026
Registration No
FA/2317/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
285-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 ( 285 )
Sub-Category
2082-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 - COMPENSATION - UNDER SECTION - 166 - FATAL ( 2082 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Adv. MR HS MUNSHAW(
Respondent(s)
URMILADEVI RAMBABU SING @ SINH Advocate - null(
KARANKUMAR RAMBABU SING @ SINH
BHANU LAKHABHAI BALASARA
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 08-06-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
Summary of FA/2317/2026 The High Court of Gujarat admitted the first appeal by Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation against the tribunal's judgment and award. On the interim relief application, the court stayed execution of the award on condition that 100% of the awarded amount be deposited within four weeks; 30% shall be released to the claimant while 70% is invested in fixed deposits for five years, retained by tribunal's Nazir, with no loans permitted without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Summary of FA/2317/2026 The High Court of Gujarat admitted the first appeal by Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation against the tribunal's judgment and award. On the interim relief application, the court stayed execution of the award on condition that 100% of the awarded amount be deposited within four weeks; 30% shall be released to the claimant while 70% is invested in fixed deposits for five years, retained by tribunal's Nazir, with no loans permitted without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts