RAJESHBHAI @ RAJU ATMARAM PANCHAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/8480/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE on 15th April 2026.

CNR: GJHC240270162026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CR.MA/15591/2026

Filing Date

08-04-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/8480/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Coram

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Penal Code, 1860 Section 306, 114

Petitioner(s)

RAJESHBHAI @ RAJU ATMARAM PANCHAL

Adv. SALMAN S KHAN(

,MR VINITKUMAR N MEHTA(

,MR VINITKUMAR N MEHTA(

, ,MR VINITKUMAR N MEHTA(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

MANOJBHAI BACHUBHAI THAKORE

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

13-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

15-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application (seeking to quash an FIR) with liberty to file an appropriate remedy. The court clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case and any future application will be decided independently without being influenced by this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application (seeking to quash an FIR) with liberty to file an appropriate remedy. The court clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case and any future application will be decided independently without being influenced by this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case