DHAVAL BALDEVBHAI BHARWAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/8425/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 27th August 2026.

CNR: GJHC240268532026

Next Hearing

27th August 2026

Filing Number

CR.MA/15524/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/8425/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

1 - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF ORDER / PROCEEDINGS (CONSENT) ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M),65(1),54
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences(pocso) Act, 2012 Section 3A,4,5(J)(2),5(L),6,11(6),12

Petitioner(s)

DHAVAL BALDEVBHAI BHARWAD

Adv. MR ZUBIN F BHARDA(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

RAJKUMARI W/O RAMAVADH PASI(SAROJ)

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

10-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

27-08-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

10-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the consent quashing petition to 27.08.2026. The case involves a settled matter between the parties where both the victim (aged 16) and accused (aged 19) were in a consensual relationship resulting in a child, with an agreement to marry upon the victim attaining majority. The court permitted the applicant to file an adjournment application before the trial court considering the peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the consent quashing petition to 27.08.2026. The case involves a settled matter between the parties where both the victim (aged 16) and accused (aged 19) were in a consensual relationship resulting in a child, with an agreement to marry upon the victim attaining majority. The court permitted the applicant to file an adjournment application before the trial court considering the peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Protection of Children from Sexual Offences(pocso) Act, 2012 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case