DHAVAL BALDEVBHAI BHARWAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/8425/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Status: 3600-Fresh Matters. Next hearing: 27th August 2026.
CNR: GJHC240268532026
Filing Number
CR.MA/15524/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/8425/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
1 - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF ORDER / PROCEEDINGS (CONSENT) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHAVAL BALDEVBHAI BHARWAD
Adv. MR ZUBIN F BHARDA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.RAJKUMARI W/O RAMAVADH PASI(SAROJ)
Case History
-
27-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Aug-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas
-
10-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia,honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. VyasView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the consent quashing petition to 27.08.2026. The case involves a settled matter between the parties where both the victim (aged 16) and accused (aged 19) were in a consensual relationship resulting in a child, with an agreement to marry upon the victim attaining majority. The court permitted the applicant to file an adjournment application before the trial court considering the peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.MA/8425/2026
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the consent quashing petition to 27.08.2026. The case involves a settled matter between the parties where both the victim (aged 16) and accused (aged 19) were in a consensual relationship resulting in a child, with an agreement to marry upon the victim attaining majority. The court permitted the applicant to file an adjournment application before the trial court considering the peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts