HATISHBHAI SHANKERBHAI PATEL vs LEGAL HEIRS OF NATVARBHAI SHANKARBHAI Advocate - null( — CA/1807/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240261022026

Filing Number

CA/11112/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/1807/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

515-SJ - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 ( 515 )

Sub-Category

1580-SJ - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 1580 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HATISHBHAI SHANKERBHAI PATEL

    Adv. MR PM LAKHANI(

  2. 2.,DHWANI P LAKHANI(

  3. 3.,DHWANI P LAKHANI(

  4. 4., ,MRS R P LAKHANI(

  5. 5.,DHWANI P LAKHANI(

  6. 6.DECEASED VIKRAMBHAI SHANKERBHAI PATEL(EXPIRED) (NO LEGAL HEIRS)

    Adv. MR PM LAKHANI(

  7. 7.,DHWANI P LAKHANI(

  8. 8.MRS R P LAKHANI(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEGAL HEIRS OF NATVARBHAI SHANKARBHAI Advocate - null(

  2. 2.1.

  3. 3.MADHUBEN NATVARBHAI PATEL1.

  4. 4.VEENABEN NATVARBHAI PATEL

  5. 5.KANAKSINH PRATAPSINH

    Adv. MR NV GANDHI(

  6. 6.AJITSINH JAYMALSINH(EXPIRED)

    Adv. MR NV GANDHI(

  7. 7.LEGAL HEIRS OF CHANDRASINH BHAGANSINH RATHOD4.

  8. 8.WD/O VAJESINH CHANDRASINH4.

  9. 9.GALIBA WD/O CHANDRASINH BHAGWANSINH4.

  10. 10.SAROJBEN D/O CHANDRASINH4.

  11. 11.MEENABEN D/O CHANDRASINH

  12. 12.HEIRS OF LATE NARPATSINH GANPATSINH5.

  13. 13.URMILABEN WD/O NARPATSINH GANPATSINH

    Adv. MR NV GANDHI(

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice J.b.pardiwala,honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. MehtaView PDF

    The High Court of Gujarat allowed the applicants' request to condone a 44-day delay in filing a restoration application (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 11111 of 2026), finding that sufficient cause had been explained and no objection was raised by the opposing party. The court approved the condonation of delay and allowed the present civil application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/1807/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat allowed the applicants' request to condone a 44-day delay in filing a restoration application (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 11111 of 2026), finding that sufficient cause had been explained and no objection was raised by the opposing party. The court approved the condonation of delay and allowed the present civil application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case