TANUJADEVI WD/O JASHPALBHAI SHANKARLAL KHANDELWAL vs MADHULAL KISHANLAL JAT Advocate - null( — CA/1813/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --33-CA DISPOSED OF on 24th April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240260992026
Filing Number
CA/11109/2026
Filing Date
04-04-2026
Registration No
CA/1813/2026
Registration Date
21-04-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
515-SJ - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 ( 515 )
Sub-Category
1580-SJ - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 1580 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--33-CA DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TANUJADEVI WD/O JASHPALBHAI SHANKARLAL KHANDELWAL
Adv. KAASH K THAKKAR(
,MR KK THAKKAR(
,MR KK THAKKAR(
, ,MR KK THAKKAR(
MINOR NIRALI D/O JASHPALBHAI SHANKARLAL KHANDELWAL
Adv. KAASH K THAKKAR(
,MR KK THAKKAR(
Respondent(s)
MADHULAL KISHANLAL JAT Advocate - null(
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
RATANLAL CHATRARAMJI RAV
TAHIRHUSAIN JAHURHUSAIN
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 24-04-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
The High Court of Gujarat condoned a 1005-day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 31.03.2023, accepting that the delay resulted from document collection difficulties and the applicants' financial constraints rather than intentional misconduct. The court allowed the appeal to proceed subject to the condition that claimants cannot claim interest for the delayed period if the enhancement appeal succeeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Gujarat condoned a 1005-day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 31.03.2023, accepting that the delay resulted from document collection difficulties and the applicants' financial constraints rather than intentional misconduct. The court allowed the appeal to proceed subject to the condition that claimants cannot claim interest for the delayed period if the enhancement appeal succeeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts