M/S. FRONTLINE CORPORATION LIMITED vs TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICE LIMITED Advocate - NANAVATI ASSOCIATES( — SCA/5160/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 21st August 2026.
CNR: GJHC240260932026
Filing Number
SCA/11103/2026
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
SCA/5160/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
500-SJ - NON-SERVICE - LOWER COURT - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 500 )
Sub-Category
1484-SJ - NON-SERVICE - LOWER COURT - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1484 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. FRONTLINE CORPORATION LIMITED
Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(
-
2.,MR DHRUV D DESAI(
-
3.,MR DHRUV D DESAI(
-
4., ,MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(
-
5.,MR DHRUV D DESAI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICE LIMITED Advocate - NANAVATI ASSOCIATES(
Case History
-
21-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Aug-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
08-May-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
13-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice in the special civil application filed by M/S. Frontline Corporation Limited against Tata Consultancy Service Limited, making it returnable on 08.05.2026. Direct service of notice, as requested by the petitioner, has been permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/5160/2026
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice in the special civil application filed by M/S. Frontline Corporation Limited against Tata Consultancy Service Limited, making it returnable on 08.05.2026. Direct service of notice, as requested by the petitioner, has been permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts