SEJALBEN VINUBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/5126/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.

Next hearing 18-Aug-2026

CNR: GJHC240260762026

Filing Number

SCA/11086/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

SCA/5126/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )

Sub-Category

1511-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - TRANSFER ( 1511 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SEJALBEN VINUBHAI PATEL

    Adv. MR NIKUL K SONI(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  2. 2.DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCATION

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  3. 3.DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER

    Adv. MR MANISH J PATEL(

  4. 4.DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER

    Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(

Case History

  1. 18-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Aug-2026

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

    Case Adjourned: In Special Civil Application No. 5126 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, notice was issued and returnable on 18th August, 2026. Service of notice was waived for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by the Learned AGP, while direct service was permitted for the remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/5126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned: In Special Civil Application No. 5126 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, notice was issued and returnable on 18th August, 2026. Service of notice was waived for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by the Learned AGP, while direct service was permitted for the remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case