NARESHBHAI NATUBHAI MARVADI vs KISHANKUMAR SHANTILAL MARVADI Advocate - null( — CA/1965/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --33-CA DISPOSED OF on 06th May 2026.

CNR: GJHC240260392026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CA/11068/2026

Filing Date

04-04-2026

Registration No

CA/1965/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

515-SJ - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 ( 515 )

Sub-Category

1580-SJ - CIVIL APPLICATION - LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 1580 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--33-CA DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

NARESHBHAI NATUBHAI MARVADI

Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(

Respondent(s)

KISHANKUMAR SHANTILAL MARVADI Advocate - null(

RAVJIBHAI JAYANTIBHAI HARIJAN

JAYANTIBHAI MULJIBHAI HARIJAN

I.C.I.C.I LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

13-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

30-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

06-05-2026

529-FOR ADMISSION

Orders

13-04-2026

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

06-05-2026
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Summary: The High Court of Gujarat granted condonation of 49 days' delay in filing a First Appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 11.11.2025. Justice Mool Chand Tyagi allowed the application, accepting the applicant's explanation that the delay resulted from time required to arrange funds, obtain High Court advocate's opinion, and prepare supporting affidavits between January and March 2026. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Gujarat granted condonation of 49 days' delay in filing a First Appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 11.11.2025. Justice Mool Chand Tyagi allowed the application, accepting the applicant's explanation that the delay resulted from time required to arrange funds, obtain High Court advocate's opinion, and prepare supporting affidavits between January and March 2026. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case