DHARMENDRAKUMAR SHANTILAL JANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/6105/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240257592026
Filing Number
SCA/10982/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
SCA/6105/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
331-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 331 )
Sub-Category
1311-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - REVISIONAL JURISDICTION U/S.211. ( 1311 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHARMENDRAKUMAR SHANTILAL JANI
Adv. MR RUSI B TRIVEDI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF GIR SOMNATH
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF UNA
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
4.MAMLATDAR, KODINAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
29-Apr-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice returnable on 29.06.2026 in a Special Civil Application challenging cellular tower installation regulations. The court granted an interim stay, directing that the impugned orders dated 10.11.2020 (District Collector) and 03.12.2025 (SSRD) shall not be acted upon until the next hearing, relying on precedent that cellular towers are permissible in residential areas without change of use permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
13-Apr-2026
Additional Registrar (Judicial)
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/6105/2026
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice returnable on 29.06.2026 in a Special Civil Application challenging cellular tower installation regulations. The court granted an interim stay, directing that the impugned orders dated 10.11.2020 (District Collector) and 03.12.2025 (SSRD) shall not be acted upon until the next hearing, relying on precedent that cellular towers are permissible in residential areas without change of use permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts