LEENABEN SHETALBHAI SHAH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — LPA/370/2026
Case under Letters Patent, 1865 Section 15. Disposed: --26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE on 06th May 2026.
CNR: GJHC240257432026
Filing Number
LPA/10966/2026
Filing Date
02-04-2026
Registration No
LPA/370/2026
Registration Date
02-05-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
Coram
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
230-LPA - NON-SERVICE-LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 230 )
Sub-Category
1086-LPA - NON-SERVICE-LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1086 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LEENABEN SHETALBHAI SHAH
Adv. MR ANKIT SHAH(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
SPECIAL SECRETARY(APPEALS),
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BHAVNAGAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
DY. COLLECTOR OFFICER, BHAVNAGAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
CITY SERVEY SUPERINTENDENT, BHAVNAGAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
AMULAKBHAI MOHANBHAI SHAH
Adv. JENIL M SHAH(
DECD. CHANDRAKANTBHAI MOHANBHAI SHAH(Legal Heir)
Adv. 7.
HETALKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI SHAH7.
MEHULKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI SHAH7.
SHETALKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 06-05-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
The Gujarat High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the cancellation of a mutation entry that registered her name based on a gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found the mutation entry was wrongly processed because the recorded joint owner and the heirs of the gift deed executor were not given notice during the mutation proceedings, violating procedural fairness. However, the court clarified that the appellant may pursue her substantive property rights claim through a separate civil suit, which will not be affected by this mutation cancellation decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the cancellation of a mutation entry that registered her name based on a gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found the mutation entry was wrongly processed because the recorded joint owner and the heirs of the gift deed executor were not given notice during the mutation proceedings, violating procedural fairness. However, the court clarified that the appellant may pursue her substantive property rights claim through a separate civil suit, which will not be affected by this mutation cancellation decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts