LEENABEN SHETALBHAI SHAH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — LPA/370/2026

Case under Letters Patent, 1865 Section 15. Disposed: --26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240257432026

Filing Number

LPA/10966/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

LPA/370/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal , Honourable Mr.justice D.n.ray

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal , Honourable Mr.justice D.n.ray

Bench Type

DIVISION

Category

230-LPA - NON-SERVICE-LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 230 )

Sub-Category

1086-LPA - NON-SERVICE-LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1086 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1865 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEENABEN SHETALBHAI SHAH

    Adv. MR ANKIT SHAH(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  2. 2.SPECIAL SECRETARY(APPEALS),

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  3. 3.DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BHAVNAGAR

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  4. 4.DY. COLLECTOR OFFICER, BHAVNAGAR

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  5. 5.CITY SERVEY SUPERINTENDENT, BHAVNAGAR

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  6. 6.AMULAKBHAI MOHANBHAI SHAH

    Adv. JENIL M SHAH(

  7. 7.DECD. CHANDRAKANTBHAI MOHANBHAI SHAH(Legal Heir)

    Adv. 7.

  8. 8.HETALKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI SHAH7.

  9. 9.MEHULKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI SHAH7.

  10. 10.SHETALKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Honourable The Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal,honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjariaView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the cancellation of a mutation entry that registered her name based on a gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found the mutation entry was wrongly processed because the recorded joint owner and the heirs of the gift deed executor were not given notice during the mutation proceedings, violating procedural fairness. However, the court clarified that the appellant may pursue her substantive property rights claim through a separate civil suit, which will not be affected by this mutation cancellation decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable The Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal , Honourable Mr.justice D.n.ray

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/370/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the cancellation of a mutation entry that registered her name based on a gift deed from her father-in-law. The court found the mutation entry was wrongly processed because the recorded joint owner and the heirs of the gift deed executor were not given notice during the mutation proceedings, violating procedural fairness. However, the court clarified that the appellant may pursue her substantive property rights claim through a separate civil suit, which will not be affected by this mutation cancellation decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case