GOVINDBHAI VALUBHAI DANGAR vs BHAVNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Advocate - MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA( — SCA/5478/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th September 2026.
CNR: GJHC240255922026
Filing Number
SCA/10918/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
SCA/5478/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )
Sub-Category
1534-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - PROMOTION ( 1534 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVINDBHAI VALUBHAI DANGAR
Adv. CHINTAN K GANDHI(
-
2.,MR. SANDIP A. KAPADIYA(
-
3.,MR. SANDIP A. KAPADIYA(
-
4., ,MR. ASHOK K. PARMAR(
-
5.,MR. SANDIP A. KAPADIYA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAVNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Advocate - MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA(
-
2.STANDING COMMITTEE
Adv. MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA(
-
3.CHIEF AUDITOR
Adv. MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA(
Case History
-
17-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Sep-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
21-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice in the special civil application filed by Govindbhai Valubhai Dangar against Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation and others. The notice is returnable on 17.09.2026, and the respondent's advocate waived service of notice on behalf of the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
13-Apr-2026
Additional Registrar (Judicial)
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/5478/2026
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice in the special civil application filed by Govindbhai Valubhai Dangar against Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation and others. The notice is returnable on 17.09.2026, and the respondent's advocate waived service of notice on behalf of the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts