BHARTIBEN KISHORBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/8302/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: --58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240250652026

Filing Number

CR.MA/14385/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/8302/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2020 Section 3,4,5C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARTIBEN KISHORBHAI PATEL

    Adv. MR ANAND M RANPARA(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

  2. 2.MITRAJSINH ANILSINH JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia,honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. VyasView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court allowed the applicant's petition and quashed the FIR and chargesheet filed under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020. The court found that the underlying land dispute between the parties had been amicably resolved through an out-of-court settlement, evidenced by a Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.03.2026 and a registered sale deed, with the complainant expressing no objection to quashing the proceedings. The court held that continuing the criminal trial would constitute abuse of process of law and unnecessary harassment, warranting dismissal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Vimal K. Vyas

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.MA/8302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court allowed the applicant's petition and quashed the FIR and chargesheet filed under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020. The court found that the underlying land dispute between the parties had been amicably resolved through an out-of-court settlement, evidenced by a Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.03.2026 and a registered sale deed, with the complainant expressing no objection to quashing the proceedings. The court held that continuing the criminal trial would constitute abuse of process of law and unnecessary harassment, warranting dismissal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case