PATEL SANKETBHAI DINESHBHAI vs STATE OF GUJARAT, REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF NAGARPALIKA, SOUTH ZONE SURAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/5176/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
CNR: GJHC240246292026
Filing Number
SCA/10469/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCA/5176/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )
Sub-Category
1503-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - REINSTATEMENT ( 1503 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL SANKETBHAI DINESHBHAI
Adv. MR VICKY B MEHTA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT, REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF NAGARPALIKA, SOUTH ZONE SURAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.STATE OF GUJARAT, SECRETARY, GUJARAT URBAN DEVELOPMENT MISSION
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.BILIMORA NAGARPALIKA
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
4.STATE OF GUJARAT, COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPALITIES ADMINISTRATION
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Aug-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
13-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued a notice returnable on 18th August 2026 in the Special Civil Application filed by Patel Sanketbhai Dineshbhai against the State of Gujarat and others. The Government Pleader waived service for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 4, while direct service was permitted for remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/5176/2026
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued a notice returnable on 18th August 2026 in the Special Civil Application filed by Patel Sanketbhai Dineshbhai against the State of Gujarat and others. The Government Pleader waived service for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 4, while direct service was permitted for remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts