ARVINDBHAI KACHARABHAI PATEL vs BANK OF BARODA Advocate - MS NALINI S LODHA( — SCA/6917/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 529-For Admission. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240241042026
Filing Number
SCA/10254/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCA/6917/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
518-SJ - NON-SERVICE - BANKING MATTERS - BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 ( 518 )
Sub-Category
1582-SJ-NON-SERVICE-BANKING MATTERS-BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949-RELATING TO RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & OTHER BANKS UNDER THE BANKING REGULATIONS ACT & OTHER BANKING LAWS ( 1582 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVINDBHAI KACHARABHAI PATEL
Adv. NATASHA SUTARIA(
-
2.KHUSHBOO MEHULKUMAR PATEL
Adv. NATASHA SUTARIA(
-
3.MEHULKUMAR ARVINDBHAI PATEL
Adv. NATASHA SUTARIA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANK OF BARODA Advocate - MS NALINI S LODHA(
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
529-For Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel
-
11-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. KarielView PDF
Case Summary: In SCA/6917/2026 before the Gujarat High Court, petitioners Arvindbhai Kacharabhai Patel and others challenged Bank of Baroda. On 11/06/2026, Justice Nikhil S. Kariel adjourned the case to 02/07/2026 to allow the respondent bank's advocate time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta
-
07-May-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/6917/2026
Case Summary: In SCA/6917/2026 before the Gujarat High Court, petitioners Arvindbhai Kacharabhai Patel and others challenged Bank of Baroda. On 11/06/2026, Justice Nikhil S. Kariel adjourned the case to 02/07/2026 to allow the respondent bank's advocate time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts