BANTI S/O KRUSHNA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/8366/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE on 27th April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240238922026
Filing Number
CR.MA/13778/2026
Filing Date
27-03-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/8366/2026
Registration Date
07-04-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BANTI S/O KRUSHNA
Adv. MR N R DESAI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
529-FOR ADMISSION
3600-FRESH MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
| 10-04-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 27-04-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Banti S/O Krushna, who was accused of liquor trafficking worth ₹1,58,700 and using forged vehicle number plates under the Prohibition Act and IPC sections. The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement based on co-accused statements and his absconding behavior, and ruled that custodial interrogation was necessary for proper investigation. Additionally, considering Gujarat's status as a dry state committed to total prohibition, the court held that granting bail would hamper the prosecution's case and public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Banti S/O Krushna, who was accused of liquor trafficking worth ₹1,58,700 and using forged vehicle number plates under the Prohibition Act and IPC sections. The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement based on co-accused statements and his absconding behavior, and ruled that custodial interrogation was necessary for proper investigation. Additionally, considering Gujarat's status as a dry state committed to total prohibition, the court held that granting bail would hamper the prosecution's case and public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts