M/S. ZENIUM CABLES LTD. vs UTTAMBHAI BHANIYABHAI (BHANABHAI) PATEL Advocate - DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)( — CRA/230/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 115. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240235022026
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
CRA/9986/2026
Filing Date
25-03-2026
Registration No
CRA/230/2026
Registration Date
07-04-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
272-SJ - CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 272 )
Sub-Category
1226-SJ - CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - REJECTION OF THE PLAINT UNDER - ORDER - 7 RULE 11 ( 1226 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. ZENIUM CABLES LTD.
Adv. HARI K BRAHMBHATT(
SHRI HARSHA L. GOTI , DIRECTOR OF M/S. ZENIUM CABLES LTD.
Adv. HARI K BRAHMBHATT(
SHRI CHETAN RATHOD , GENERAL MANAGER OF M/S. ZENIUM CABLES LTD.
Adv. HARI K BRAHMBHATT(
Respondent(s)
UTTAMBHAI BHANIYABHAI (BHANABHAI) PATEL Advocate - DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
SHRI RAMESHBHAI BHANIYABHAI (BHANABHAI) PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 25-06-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice in Civil Revision Application No. 230/2026 filed by M/S. Zenium Cables Ltd. against Uttambhai Bhaniyabhai Patel, making it returnable on 25.06.2026. Direct service was permitted as requested. The applicants (original defendants) were permitted to apply for adjournment before the lower court, which shall consider such application in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat issued notice in Civil Revision Application No. 230/2026 filed by M/S. Zenium Cables Ltd. against Uttambhai Bhaniyabhai Patel, making it returnable on 25.06.2026. Direct service was permitted as requested. The applicants (original defendants) were permitted to apply for adjournment before the lower court, which shall consider such application in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts