THE MANAGER/DIRECTOR GSP CROP SCIENCE LIMITED vs HARDIKKUMAR UMEDBHAI BHOI Advocate - null( — SCA/7387/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 00. Status: 192-Notice & Adjourned Matters. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240232132026
Filing Number
SCA/9858/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCA/7387/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
321-SJ - LABOUR - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947 ( 321 )
Sub-Category
1295-SJ - LABOUR - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT, 1947 - REINSTATEMENT ( 1295 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MANAGER/DIRECTOR GSP CROP SCIENCE LIMITED
Adv. MS PRACHI UPADHYAY(
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARDIKKUMAR UMEDBHAI BHOI Advocate - null(
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
Summary of Case SCA/7387/2026 The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the case with notice returnable on 15.06.2026. The court consolidated four related Special Civil Applications (7341, 7350, 7363, and 7387 of 2026) filed by GSP Crop Science Limited against Bharatbhai Raysinh Gohil, finding they arise from common questions and require consideration. Direct service was permitted as requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/7387/2026
Summary of Case SCA/7387/2026 The High Court of Gujarat adjourned the case with notice returnable on 15.06.2026. The court consolidated four related Special Civil Applications (7341, 7350, 7363, and 7387 of 2026) filed by GSP Crop Science Limited against Bharatbhai Raysinh Gohil, finding they arise from common questions and require consideration. Direct service was permitted as requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts