RAJUBHAI KHETABHAI KARAMTA (RABARI) vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/7430/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE on 15th April 2026.

CNR: GJHC240229622026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CR.MA/13216/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/7430/2026

Registration Date

25-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Coram

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a),65(e),98(2),81

Petitioner(s)

RAJUBHAI KHETABHAI KARAMTA (RABARI)

Adv. DENISH V MAVADHIYA(

,MR KHODABHAI P PINGAL(

,MR KHODABHAI P PINGAL(

, ,MR KHODABHAI P PINGAL(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

PRAKASHBHAI JIVABHAI DABHI

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

01-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

15-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

20-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

The Gujarat High Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Rajubhai Khetabhai Karamta seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/order, as the applicant's advocate requested permission to withdraw the application to pursue appropriate remedies elsewhere. The court granted the withdrawal permission but expressly clarified it had not examined the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Rajubhai Khetabhai Karamta seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/order, as the applicant's advocate requested permission to withdraw the application to pursue appropriate remedies elsewhere. The court granted the withdrawal permission but expressly clarified it had not examined the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case