MANA KANABHAI KATARA(RABARI) vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/7516/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE on 15th April 2026.

CNR: GJHC240229522026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CR.MA/13208/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/7516/2026

Registration Date

27-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Coram

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

2 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF COMPLAINT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A, 65E, 98(2), 81

Petitioner(s)

MANA KANABHAI KATARA(RABARI)

Adv. DENISH V MAVADHIYA(

,MR KHODABHAI P PINGAL(

,MR KHODABHAI P PINGAL(

, ,MR KHODABHAI P PINGAL(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

PRAKASHBHAI JIVABHAI DABHI

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

01-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

15-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

21-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant Mana Kanabhai Katara's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application for quashing/setting aside an FIR, permitting him to pursue appropriate alternative remedies. The court clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case, disposing of the application as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant Mana Kanabhai Katara's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application for quashing/setting aside an FIR, permitting him to pursue appropriate alternative remedies. The court clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case, disposing of the application as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case