KESHAVLAL SENDHARAM PRAJAPATI vs LEGAL HEIRS OF MANILAL GOVINDLAL PATEL (DECEASED) Advocate - null( — SCA/5097/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: GJHC240222582026
Filing Number
SCA/9459/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCA/5097/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
500-SJ - NON-SERVICE - LOWER COURT - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 500 )
Sub-Category
1484-SJ - NON-SERVICE - LOWER COURT - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1484 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KESHAVLAL SENDHARAM PRAJAPATI
Adv. MR RASESH H PARIKH(
-
2.,MR.HEMANG H PARIKH(
-
3.,MR.HEMANG H PARIKH(
-
4., ,MR.HEMANG H PARIKH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.LEGAL HEIRS OF MANILAL GOVINDLAL PATEL (DECEASED) Advocate - null(
-
2.1.
-
3.SHARDABEN WD/O. MANILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
4.1.
-
5.MANJULABEN MANILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
6.1.
-
7.DASRATHBHAI MANILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
8.1.
-
9.GHANSHYAMBHAI MANILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
10.1.
-
11.BALDEVBHAI MANILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
12.GORDHANBHAI GOVINDBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
13.LHS OF CHUNILAL GOVINDBHAI PATEL (DECEASED)3.
-
14.MADHUBEN WD/O. CHUNILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
15.3.
-
16.ARVINDBHAI CHUNILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
17.3.
-
18.KAILASHBEN CHUNILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
19.3.
-
20.SURESHBHAI CHUNILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
21.3.
-
22.CHANDRIKABEN CHUNILAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
23.3.
-
24.DECEASED VINUBHAI CHUNILAL PATEL THROUGH HIS HEIRS3.6.
-
25.SHANTABEN WD/O. VINUBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
26.3.6.
-
27.ASHISH VINUBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
28.3.6.
-
29.YOGESH VINUBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
30.DAHIBEN D/O. LALDAS JESANGDAS
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
31.BHAGWAN KESHAVLAL PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
32.MANJULABEN PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
33.DIVYESHBHAI BHAGWANBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
34.KALPESHBHAI AMRUTBHAI DESAI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
35.LALJIBHAI RANCHODBHAI DESAI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
36.RAMESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI DESAI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
37.PARESHBHAI MANUBHAI BRAHMBHATT
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
38.KETANBHAI MANUBHAI BRAHMBHATT
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
39.AMRISHBHAI RAMBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
40.DEVENDRA NARANBHAI PATEL
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
41.RASIKBHAI MARGABHAI PATEL
-
42.KINJAL KEYUR PATEL
-
43.JAYSUKHBHAI RAVJIBHAI DOBARIYA
-
44.RAMESHBHAI RAVJIBHAI DOBARIYA
-
45.NATHALAL SENDHARAM PRAJAPATI (DECEASED)19.
-
46.VINUBHAI NATHALAL PRAJAPATI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
47.19.
-
48.JAGDISHBHAI NATHALAL PRAJAPATI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
-
49.19.
-
50.MUKESHBHAI NATHALAL PRAJAPATI
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
10-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N.v.anjaria,honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. DesaiView PDF
Summary: In Special Civil Application No. 5097 of 2026 before the Gujarat High Court, notice was issued in the matter of Keshavlal Sendharam Prajapati versus Legal Heirs of Manilal Govindlal Patel (Deceased) and others, returnable on 25.06.2026. Direct service was permitted as prayed, and respondents 15-18 waived service of notice through their counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Devan M. Desai
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/5097/2026
Summary: In Special Civil Application No. 5097 of 2026 before the Gujarat High Court, notice was issued in the matter of Keshavlal Sendharam Prajapati versus Legal Heirs of Manilal Govindlal Patel (Deceased) and others, returnable on 25.06.2026. Direct service was permitted as prayed, and respondents 15-18 waived service of notice through their counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts