ROMAL VINODKUMAR BAFNA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/7531/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: --27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240219882026

Filing Number

CR.MA/12688/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/7531/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - REGULAR BAIL - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 132(1)(B),132(1)(C),135(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROMAL VINODKUMAR BAFNA

    Adv. MR AJIT S NAIR(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

  2. 2.S. N. PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. KarielView PDF

    The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant Romal Vinodkumar Bafna's request to withdraw his regular bail application before chargesheet with liberty to approach the Trial Court instead, as the Trial Court had not been approached after the chargesheet was filed. The court did not examine the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.MA/7531/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant Romal Vinodkumar Bafna's request to withdraw his regular bail application before chargesheet with liberty to approach the Trial Court instead, as the Trial Court had not been approached after the chargesheet was filed. The court did not examine the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case