JITENDRA RAMESHBHAI THAKKAR DIRECTOR OF M/S. UMANG DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/7231/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE on 30th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240216992026
Filing Number
CR.MA/12511/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/7231/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
Coram
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA RAMESHBHAI THAKKAR DIRECTOR OF M/S. UMANG DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD
Adv. SAGAR J SHAH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE (DGGI) THROUGH SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER
Adv. TIRTH NAYAK(
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia,honourable Mr.justice P. M. RavalView PDF
The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant's request to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a fresh application in case of future difficulties. The application was disposed of as withdrawn on the applicant's own motion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval
-
24-Mar-2026
Registrar (Judicial)
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.MA/7231/2026
The High Court of Gujarat granted the applicant's request to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a fresh application in case of future difficulties. The application was disposed of as withdrawn on the applicant's own motion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts