ADITYA AJAYKUMAR CHOKSI vs HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT Advocate - MR DM DEVNANI( — SCR.A/4253/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,141. Disposed: --59-RULE ISSUED & RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED@FH on 30th April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240216872024
Filing Number
SCR.A/11643/2024
Filing Date
22-03-2024
Registration No
SCR.A/4253/2024
Registration Date
30-03-2024
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
2317-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - SEEKING DIRECTIONS - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 2317 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--59-RULE ISSUED & RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED@FH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADITYA AJAYKUMAR CHOKSI
Adv. ADITYA A CHOKSI(
,PARTY IN PERSON(
,PARTY IN PERSON(
, ,PARTY IN PERSON(
Respondent(s)
HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT Advocate - MR DM DEVNANI(
, ,LAW OFFICER BRANCH(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
625-DIRECTION MATTERS
625-DIRECTION MATTERS
625-DIRECTION MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2024 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 05-04-2024 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 13-04-2026 | 625-DIRECTION MATTERS |
| 18-12-2025 | 625-DIRECTION MATTERS |
| 27-11-2025 | 625-DIRECTION MATTERS |
Orders
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition challenging the 2019 instructions requiring successive bail appeals under the SC/ST Atrocities Act to be placed before different benches rather than the same judge. The court held that the Chief Justice's roster decisions are final and not subject to legal scrutiny, and relied on recent Supreme Court clarification that while applications from the same FIR should generally go to one judge, roster changes and bench assignments can affect this principle's application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition challenging the 2019 instructions requiring successive bail appeals under the SC/ST Atrocities Act to be placed before different benches rather than the same judge. The court held that the Chief Justice's roster decisions are final and not subject to legal scrutiny, and relied on recent Supreme Court clarification that while applications from the same FIR should generally go to one judge, roster changes and bench assignments can affect this principle's application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts