ADITYA AJAYKUMAR CHOKSI vs HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT Advocate - MR DM DEVNANI( — SCR.A/4253/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,141. Disposed: --59-RULE ISSUED & RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED@FH on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240216872024

Filing Number

SCR.A/11643/2024

Filing Date

22-Mar-2024

Registration No

SCR.A/4253/2024

Registration Date

30-Mar-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

2317-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - SEEKING DIRECTIONS - THROUGH ADVOCATE ( 2317 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--59-RULE ISSUED & RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED@FH

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,141
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 14-A-(2)
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (53 of 1986) Section 102

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA AJAYKUMAR CHOKSI

    Adv. ADITYA A CHOKSI(

  2. 2.,PARTY IN PERSON(

  3. 3.,PARTY IN PERSON(

  4. 4., ,PARTY IN PERSON(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT Advocate - MR DM DEVNANI(

  2. 2., ,LAW OFFICER BRANCH(

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition challenging the 2019 instructions requiring successive bail appeals under the SC/ST Atrocities Act to be placed before different benches rather than the same judge. The court held that the Chief Justice's roster decisions are final and not subject to legal scrutiny, and relied on recent Supreme Court clarification that while applications from the same FIR should generally go to one judge, roster changes and bench assignments can affect this principle's application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar

  8. 09-Sep-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar

  9. 15-Jul-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar

  10. 11-Jun-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi

  11. 24-Apr-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi

  12. 09-Apr-2025

    625-Direction Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi

  13. 27-Mar-2025

    125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt

  14. 28-Jan-2025

    125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt

  15. 29-Nov-2024

    125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt

  16. 29-Oct-2024

    125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  17. 28-Aug-2024

    125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  18. 10-Jul-2024

    125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar

  19. 06-May-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi,honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. SutharView PDF

  20. 05-Apr-2024

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar

  21. 28-Mar-2024

    Registrar (Judicial)

  22. 28-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 22-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCR.A/4253/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition challenging the 2019 instructions requiring successive bail appeals under the SC/ST Atrocities Act to be placed before different benches rather than the same judge. The court held that the Chief Justice's roster decisions are final and not subject to legal scrutiny, and relied on recent Supreme Court clarification that while applications from the same FIR should generally go to one judge, roster changes and bench assignments can affect this principle's application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case