PAYAL PUSHKAR SINGH vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA /7303/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH on 30th March 2026.

CNR: GJHC240216672026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CR.MA /12493/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

CR.MA /7303/2026

Registration Date

24-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Coram

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 482
BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA Section 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 54

Petitioner(s)

PAYAL PUSHKAR SINGH

Adv. MR ASHISH M DAGLI(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

24-03-2026

529-FOR ADMISSION

30-03-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

24-03-2026

REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

30-03-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

The Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to Payal Pushkar Singh in a forgery case involving an allegedly forged power of attorney in a matrimonial property dispute, finding that the primary accused (the applicant's co-accused wife) was already granted regular bail and the applicant had no prior antecedents. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to Payal Pushkar Singh in a forgery case involving an allegedly forged power of attorney in a matrimonial property dispute, finding that the primary accused (the applicant's co-accused wife) was already granted regular bail and the applicant had no prior antecedents. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case