KANTABEN WD/O KANTILAL BHOVANBHAI MEHTA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/4276/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,21,226,227. Disposed: --35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE on 02nd April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240214962026
Filing Number
SCR.A/12365/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/4276/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANTABEN WD/O KANTILAL BHOVANBHAI MEHTA
Adv. DHARMESH D NANAVATY(
-
2.,MR ADITYA P MISTRI(
-
3.,MR ADITYA P MISTRI(
-
4., ,MR ADITYA P MISTRI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.RAMESHBHAI CHANABHAI BORAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Summary: The Gujarat High Court dismissed the petitioner's special criminal application for quashing, but directed that she may request the trial court for expeditious disposal of the underlying land grabbing case under Section 9(6) of the Land Grabbing Act, which mandates trial completion within six months. The court disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner (a senior citizen and first informant) to pursue faster trial proceedings before the trial court in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
24-Mar-2026
Registrar (Judicial)
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/4276/2026
Summary: The Gujarat High Court dismissed the petitioner's special criminal application for quashing, but directed that she may request the trial court for expeditious disposal of the underlying land grabbing case under Section 9(6) of the Land Grabbing Act, which mandates trial completion within six months. The court disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner (a senior citizen and first informant) to pursue faster trial proceedings before the trial court in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts