PUNAM MANOJKUMAR SINDHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A /4469/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: --58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH on 06th April 2026.

CNR: GJHC240214872026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

SCR.A /12359/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

SCR.A /4469/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )

Sub-Category

1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section 226, 227
BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 528
BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA Section 318(4)

Petitioner(s)

PUNAM MANOJKUMAR SINDHI

Adv. MR A A ZABUAWALA(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

BHAVESHKUMAR RAMANLAL PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

24-03-2026

529-FOR ADMISSION

06-04-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

24-03-2026

REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

06-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

The Gujarat High Court quashed FIR No. 11209016251466 of 2025 registered against Punam Manojkumar Sindhi for offences under Section 318(4) IPC, as the parties reached an amicable settlement and the original complainant had no objection to withdrawal. The court granted the quashing petition considering the settlement, the petitioner's clean antecedents, and mutual consent of all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court quashed FIR No. 11209016251466 of 2025 registered against Punam Manojkumar Sindhi for offences under Section 318(4) IPC, as the parties reached an amicable settlement and the original complainant had no objection to withdrawal. The court granted the quashing petition considering the settlement, the petitioner's clean antecedents, and mutual consent of all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case