SANJAYBHAI PRAVINBHAI VAGHELA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/5229/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
CNR: GJHC240213992026
Filing Number
SCA/9081/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCA/5229/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )
Sub-Category
1503-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - REINSTATEMENT ( 1503 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI PRAVINBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. MS VIDHI J BHATT(
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE - ANAND
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
4.MAMLATDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE - UMRETH
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
5.SHREE ENTERPRISE
Adv. DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Aug-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
13-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF
Summary: In Special Civil Application No. 5229/2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, Justice Nirzar S. Desai issued a procedural order on 13/04/2026 adjourning the case for the next hearing on 18th August 2026. Notice was issued with service of process waived for Respondent Nos. 1, 3, and 4, while direct service was permitted for the remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/5229/2026
Summary: In Special Civil Application No. 5229/2026 before the High Court of Gujarat, Justice Nirzar S. Desai issued a procedural order on 13/04/2026 adjourning the case for the next hearing on 18th August 2026. Notice was issued with service of process waived for Respondent Nos. 1, 3, and 4, while direct service was permitted for the remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts