ROANK CHANDRAKANTBHAI BAROT THRO. WIFE HEMANGI D/O UMEDBHAI SOLANKI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A /3981/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 21,22,226. Disposed: --40-WITHDRAWN @ FH on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240213642026
Filing Number
SCR.A /12307/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
SCR.A /3981/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
3011-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 ( 3011 )
Sub-Category
8-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 - PRO-DETENTION - DANGEROUS PERSON ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROANK CHANDRAKANTBHAI BAROT THRO. WIFE HEMANGI D/O UMEDBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. MR PRATIK G ADVANI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, AHMEDABAD
JAIL SUPERINTENDENT
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
637 - FRESH MATTERS- PRO DETENTION
194-FOR FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | 637 - FRESH MATTERS- PRO DETENTION | |
| 01-04-2026 | 194-FOR FINAL HEARING |
Orders
The High Court of Gujarat disposed of Special Criminal Application No. 3981/2026 filed by Roank Chandrakantbhai Barot and his wife Hemangi against the State of Gujarat as infructuous, upon the petitioner's advocate seeking permission to withdraw the petition on the grounds that it had become moot or purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Gujarat disposed of Special Criminal Application No. 3981/2026 filed by Roank Chandrakantbhai Barot and his wife Hemangi against the State of Gujarat as infructuous, upon the petitioner's advocate seeking permission to withdraw the petition on the grounds that it had become moot or purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts