ANIL @KALI BALDEVBHAI SOLANKI THRO SANJAY BALDEVBHAI SOLANKI vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Advocate - null( — SCR.A /3978/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,14,21,22. Disposed: --38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH on 01st April 2026.

CNR: GJHC240213212026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

SCR.A /12282/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

SCR.A /3978/2026

Registration Date

18-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI

Bench Type

DIVISION

Category

3011-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 ( 3011 )

Sub-Category

5-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 - PRO-DETENTION - BOOTLEGGER ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section 226,14,21,22
PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 Section 2(B)

Petitioner(s)

ANIL @KALI BALDEVBHAI SOLANKI THRO SANJAY BALDEVBHAI SOLANKI

Adv. MR. AJAY J SHEKHAVAT(

Respondent(s)

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Advocate - null(

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

JAIL SUPERITENDENT

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI

24-03-2026

637 - FRESH MATTERS- PRO DETENTION

01-04-2026

194-FOR FINAL HEARING

Orders

01-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

The Gujarat High Court quashed the preventive detention order against the petitioner, holding that the detaining authority failed to establish that the petitioner's activities as a bootlegger adversely affected public order as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The court distinguished between mere disturbance of "law and order" and prejudice to "public order," finding that the two criminal cases cited did not create any feeling of insecurity or panic among the public, and therefore did not meet the legal threshold for preventive detention. The petitioner was directed to be set at liberty forthwith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court quashed the preventive detention order against the petitioner, holding that the detaining authority failed to establish that the petitioner's activities as a bootlegger adversely affected public order as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The court distinguished between mere disturbance of "law and order" and prejudice to "public order," finding that the two criminal cases cited did not create any feeling of insecurity or panic among the public, and therefore did not meet the legal threshold for preventive detention. The petitioner was directed to be set at liberty forthwith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case