MEHULBHAI JASHUBHAI RATHOD vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA /6824/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240211742026
Filing Number
CR.MA /12184/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
CR.MA /6824/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
1 - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - QUASHING OF ORDER / PROCEEDINGS (CONSENT) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEHULBHAI JASHUBHAI RATHOD
Adv. MR S D MOGHARIYA(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
MOVAR HASINABEN AKBARBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
590-FOR CONSENT QUASHING
590-FOR CONSENT QUASHING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | 590-FOR CONSENT QUASHING | |
| 01-04-2026 | 590-FOR CONSENT QUASHING |
Orders
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
Summary The Gujarat High Court quashed the conviction order dated 06.01.2026 passed against Mehulbhai Jashubhai Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, based on the complainant's affidavit confirming amicable settlement of the dispute and consent to withdraw proceedings. The court found that continuing criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of process of law, and directed the applicant to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount as costs with the District Legal Service Authority within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court quashed the conviction order dated 06.01.2026 passed against Mehulbhai Jashubhai Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, based on the complainant's affidavit confirming amicable settlement of the dispute and consent to withdraw proceedings. The court found that continuing criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of process of law, and directed the applicant to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount as costs with the District Legal Service Authority within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts