ANANDBHAI KHENGARBHAI JARU vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA /783/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

CNR: GJHC240209862026

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

CR.RA /12060/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

CR.RA /783/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

Coram

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

903 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 903 )

Sub-Category

9 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - AGAINST INTERLOCATORY ORDER PASSED BY TRIAL COURT ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 438,442
PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 302,307,323,325,540,147,148,149,427,452,506(2)
Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

ANANDBHAI KHENGARBHAI JARU

Adv. MR ASHISH M DAGLI(

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

23-03-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

28-04-2026

116-ADJOURNED MATTERS

09-04-2026

116-ADJOURNED MATTERS

24-03-2026

116-ADJOURNED MATTERS

Orders

24-03-2026
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

The criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/783/2026) filed by Anandbhai Khengarbhai Jaru against the State of Gujarat has been adjourned to 09.04.2026 for further hearing, with the Trial Court directed not to deliver any final judgment until the conclusion of this revision application. The State's counsel sought time to file a response to the applicant's arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/783/2026) filed by Anandbhai Khengarbhai Jaru against the State of Gujarat has been adjourned to 09.04.2026 for further hearing, with the Trial Court directed not to deliver any final judgment until the conclusion of this revision application. The State's counsel sought time to file a response to the applicant's arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case