SONI RAKESH HARISHBHAI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/3974/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CNR: GJHC240209052026
Filing Number
SCR.A/12023/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/3974/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1883-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. ( 1883 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONI RAKESH HARISHBHAI
Adv. MR. KALRAV R PATEL(
-
2.,P K NAYAK(
-
3.,P K NAYAK(
-
4., ,P K NAYAK(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.AMIT S/O ASHOKBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI SONI
Adv. NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jul-2026
125-Notice Returnable & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
24-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Summary: In a Special Criminal Application (Quashing) petition filed by Soni Rakesh Harishbhai against the State of Gujarat, the High Court of Gujarat found no evidence of the petitioner's involvement in the underlying transaction—a 750 gms gold purchase between co-accused and the first informant where payment was not made. The Court issued notice returnable on 17.07.2026 and ordered that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/3974/2026
Summary: In a Special Criminal Application (Quashing) petition filed by Soni Rakesh Harishbhai against the State of Gujarat, the High Court of Gujarat found no evidence of the petitioner's involvement in the underlying transaction—a 750 gms gold purchase between co-accused and the first informant where payment was not made. The Court issued notice returnable on 17.07.2026 and ordered that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts