KANSINGH VIJAYSINGH RAWAT THROUIGH LADUSINGH HUKAMSINGH RAWAT vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A /3969/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,21,22,226. Disposed: --38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240202212026
Filing Number
SCR.A /11573/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
SCR.A /3969/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
3011-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 ( 3011 )
Sub-Category
5-DB - DETENTION - PREVENTION OF ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITIES ACT, 1985 - PRO-DETENTION - BOOTLEGGER ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANSINGH VIJAYSINGH RAWAT THROUIGH LADUSINGH HUKAMSINGH RAWAT
Adv. MOHIT P PATHAK(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
JAIL SUPERINTENDENT
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
637 - FRESH MATTERS- PRO DETENTION
194-FOR FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | 637 - FRESH MATTERS- PRO DETENTION | |
| 01-04-2026 | 194-FOR FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Summary: The Gujarat High Court quashed a preventive detention order against the petitioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The court held that a single prohibition offense (bootlegging) does not demonstrate prejudice to "public order" as required by law; mere disturbance of law and order is insufficient for preventive detention. The court distinguished between law and order violations (affecting specific individuals) and public order violations (affecting the community at large), and found the detaining authority failed to establish that the petitioner's activities created insecurity or panic among the public. The petitioner was ordered to be released immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Gujarat High Court quashed a preventive detention order against the petitioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The court held that a single prohibition offense (bootlegging) does not demonstrate prejudice to "public order" as required by law; mere disturbance of law and order is insufficient for preventive detention. The court distinguished between law and order violations (affecting specific individuals) and public order violations (affecting the community at large), and found the detaining authority failed to establish that the petitioner's activities created insecurity or panic among the public. The petitioner was ordered to be released immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts