KAVYA ADS vs AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Advocate - MR ANUJ K TRIVEDI( — SCA/4830/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: GJHC240198822024

Filing Number

SCA/9246/2024

Filing Date

16-Mar-2024

Registration No

SCA/4830/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

364-SJ - NON-SERVICE - BOMBAY PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1949 ( 364 )

Sub-Category

1354-SJ - NON-SERVICE - BOMBAY PROVINCIAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1949 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1354 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAVYA ADS

    Adv. MR.D K.PUJ(

  2. 2.,MS NIYATI K SHAH(

  3. 3.,MS NIYATI K SHAH(

  4. 4., ,MS NIYATI K SHAH(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Advocate - MR ANUJ K TRIVEDI(

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. NOTICE SERVED(

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Gujarat clarified its earlier "no coercive action" order dated 01.04.2024 in the case of Kavya Ads versus Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, holding that the restriction applies only to the impugned Advertising Policy and does not prevent the Corporation from collecting license fees and dues owed by the petitioner. The clarification application was disposed of with the court affirming that there was no intention to restrict fee collection, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  13. 06-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice J.b.pardiwala,honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. MehtaView PDF

  14. 06-Feb-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  15. 30-Jan-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  16. 22-Jan-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  17. 19-Jan-2026

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  18. 16-Dec-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  19. 11-Dec-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  20. 20-Nov-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  21. 08-Sep-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  22. 11-Aug-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  24. 01-May-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  25. 26-Mar-2025

    197-Board No. I (Notice & Adjourned Matters)

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  26. 06-Feb-2025

    Honourable The Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar,honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. BhattView PDF

  27. 06-Feb-2025

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

  28. 09-Dec-2024

    Honourable The Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar,honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. BhattView PDF

  29. 09-Dec-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel

  30. 07-Oct-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nikhil S. Kariel

  31. 28-Jun-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice K.m.thaker,honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. VishenView PDF

  32. 28-Jun-2024

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  33. 28-Jun-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  34. 06-May-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

  35. 06-May-2024

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  36. 03-Apr-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

  37. 03-Apr-2024

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  38. 01-Apr-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

  39. 28-Mar-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

  40. 20-Mar-2024

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF

  41. 20-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 16-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/4830/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Gujarat clarified its earlier "no coercive action" order dated 01.04.2024 in the case of Kavya Ads versus Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, holding that the restriction applies only to the impugned Advertising Policy and does not prevent the Corporation from collecting license fees and dues owed by the petitioner. The clarification application was disposed of with the court affirming that there was no intention to restrict fee collection, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case