NIRAV DILIPKUMAR BAUDHANWALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — SCR.A/4002/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: 100-Converted Matter. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240197312026
Filing Number
SCR.A/11387/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCR.A/4002/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
625-SJ - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 ( 625 )
Sub-Category
1 - SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION - UNDER ARTICLE 226 - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS / FIR / CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ETC. (CONSENT) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIRAV DILIPKUMAR BAUDHANWALA
Adv. KAASH K THAKKAR(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
-
2.KARISHMA @ JENI D/O JIGNESHKUMAR SHASHIKANT GANDHI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice A.Y. Kogje,honourable Mr. Justice M. R. MengdeyView PDF
Case Summary: SCR.A/4002/2026 The Gujarat High Court granted permission to convert the pending Special Criminal Application (for consent quashing) into a Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023. The petitioner's advocate was directed to submit a fresh memo within 7 days, after which the Registry will formally convert the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
590-For Consent Quashing
Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCR.A/4002/2026
Case Summary: SCR.A/4002/2026 The Gujarat High Court granted permission to convert the pending Special Criminal Application (for consent quashing) into a Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023. The petitioner's advocate was directed to submit a fresh memo within 7 days, after which the Registry will formally convert the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts