MAHESH PREMJIBHAI MOTIVARAS vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA /6617/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH on 30th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240194732026
Filing Number
CR.MA /11255/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
CR.MA /6617/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESH PREMJIBHAI MOTIVARAS
Adv. MR MONARCH K PANDYA(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
529-FOR ADMISSION
3600-FRESH MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION | |
| 23-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS | |
| 30-03-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS | |
| 24-03-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Summary The Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to four applicants accused of embezzling approximately Rs. 7.13 crore through forged documents and fake company invoices during 2019-2021. The court found the inordinate delay in filing the FIR (from 2021 to 2026), absence of custodial interrogation necessity, applicants' clean antecedents, and prior bail grant to a co-accused as compelling factors favoring bail, subject to strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to four applicants accused of embezzling approximately Rs. 7.13 crore through forged documents and fake company invoices during 2019-2021. The court found the inordinate delay in filing the FIR (from 2021 to 2026), absence of custodial interrogation necessity, applicants' clean antecedents, and prior bail grant to a co-accused as compelling factors favoring bail, subject to strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts