PATHAN UVESHKHAN IQBALKHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/6740/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE on 04th May 2026.
CNR: GJHC240191352026
Filing Number
CR.MA/11048/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
CR.MA/6740/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Coram
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATHAN UVESHKHAN IQBALKHAN
Adv. MS. DEVAL I. MODI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
, ,MR ABID R PATHAN(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
529-FOR ADMISSION
3600-FRESH MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
116-ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
| 24-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 04-05-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
| 29-04-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
| 24-04-2026 | 116-ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected Pathan Uveshkhan Iqbalkhan's anticipatory bail application in a land fraud case. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant fraudulently executed a sale agreement for property he did not own, combined with ten prior criminal antecedents involving offences including forgery, document fraud, and land grabbing, making custodial interrogation necessary and bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected Pathan Uveshkhan Iqbalkhan's anticipatory bail application in a land fraud case. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant fraudulently executed a sale agreement for property he did not own, combined with ten prior criminal antecedents involving offences including forgery, document fraud, and land grabbing, making custodial interrogation necessary and bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts