DHIRAJKUMAR PRAHLADSINH PARMAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/4067/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE on 30th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240189382026
Filing Number
SCA/8013/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
SCA/4067/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )
Sub-Category
1493-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - DIRECT RECRUITMENT ( 1493 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHIRAJKUMAR PRAHLADSINH PARMAR
Adv. MR VIJAY H NANGESH(
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.GUJARAT POLICE RECTRUITMENT BOARD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF
The Gujarat High Court allowed the petitioner's plea for re-measurement of his height after it was initially found below the prescribed limit for police recruitment. Upon re-measurement, the petitioner's height was found to be 164.7 cm, meeting the qualification standards, and he was declared eligible to proceed to the next selection round. The court also directed refund of the Rs. 10,000 deposit made toward the petition costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
24-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/4067/2026
The Gujarat High Court allowed the petitioner's plea for re-measurement of his height after it was initially found below the prescribed limit for police recruitment. Upon re-measurement, the petitioner's height was found to be 164.7 cm, meeting the qualification standards, and he was declared eligible to proceed to the next selection round. The court also directed refund of the Rs. 10,000 deposit made toward the petition costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts