CHAITANYA CHANDRAKANTBHAI BHATT PROPRIETOR OF ADVETA ENGINEER vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA /5888/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE on 25th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240179102026
Filing Number
CR.MA /10355/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
CR.MA /5888/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Coram
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )
Sub-Category
5 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAITANYA CHANDRAKANTBHAI BHATT PROPRIETOR OF ADVETA ENGINEER
Adv. MR. MAULIK M SONI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
PRAFULBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL
Adv. MR NILESH A PANDYA(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS | |
| 25-03-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS | |
| 24-03-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS | |
| 18-03-2026 | 192-NOTICE & ADJOURNED MATTERS |
Orders
The Gujarat High Court allowed the applicant Chaitanya Chandrakantbhai Bhatt's application for condonation of 60 days' delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Court found the delay sufficiently explained, as the applicant was incarcerated and facing financial constraints that prevented timely legal assistance, and applied the principle that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court allowed the applicant Chaitanya Chandrakantbhai Bhatt's application for condonation of 60 days' delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Court found the delay sufficiently explained, as the applicant was incarcerated and facing financial constraints that prevented timely legal assistance, and applied the principle that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts