VARSHABEN LAXMANBHAI JIVABHAI BARAIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.A /502/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240172332026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CR.A /9929/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
CR.A /502/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. M. VYAS
Coram
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. M. VYAS
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
8449 - DB – APPEAL – AGAINST ACQUITTAL ( 8449 )
Sub-Category
2-DB – APPEAL – AGAINST ACQUITTAL – BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 – U/S. 419 – BY ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VARSHABEN LAXMANBHAI JIVABHAI BARAIYA
Adv. MR ADITYA T PANCHOLI(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
DIPESH @ BABU RAKESHBHAI KANTARIYA
Adv. RULE NOT RECD BACK(
,BAILABLE WARRANT NOT RECEIVED BACK(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. M. VYAS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
529-FOR ADMISSION
529-FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS | |
| 24-03-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION | |
| 17-03-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The Gujarat High Court admitted the criminal appeal against acquittal filed by Varshaben Laxmanbhai Jivabhai Baraiya. The court noted that despite hostile eyewitnesses, CCTV footage and a supporting pancha's testimony directly connected the accused to the incident. A bailable warrant of Rs. 10,000 each was issued for respondent no. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court admitted the criminal appeal against acquittal filed by Varshaben Laxmanbhai Jivabhai Baraiya. The court noted that despite hostile eyewitnesses, CCTV footage and a supporting pancha's testimony directly connected the accused to the incident. A bailable warrant of Rs. 10,000 each was issued for respondent no. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts