PRAKASH SHOBHNATH GUPTA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.RA/326/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442. Disposed: --DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 07th May 2026.
CNR: GJHC240156592025
Filing Number
CR.RA/8826/2025
Filing Date
28-02-2025
Registration No
CR.RA/326/2025
Registration Date
03-03-2025
Judge
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Coram
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
903 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 903 )
Sub-Category
9 - SJ - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - AGAINST INTERLOCATORY ORDER PASSED BY TRIAL COURT ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAKASH SHOBHNATH GUPTA
Adv. ARBAAZKHAN A PATHAN (
,MOHAMADZAID I SAIYED(
,MOHAMADZAID I SAIYED(
, ,MOHAMADZAID I SAIYED(
MOHAMMED IQBAL ALLABAX VADNAGARWALA
Adv. ARBAAZKHAN A PATHAN (
,MOHAMADZAID I SAIYED(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
529-FOR ADMISSION
529-FOR ADMISSION
529-FOR ADMISSION
529-FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2025 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
| 07-05-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
| 10-04-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
| 08-01-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
| 25-11-2025 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Gujarat upheld the lower court's decision to discharge the accused in Sessions Case No. 86 of 2018, as the complainant and witnesses were untraceable and the case was withdrawn. The court permitted the case to be reopened if the complainant/witnesses are subsequently found, and disposed of the criminal revision application as the matter had become infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Gujarat upheld the lower court's decision to discharge the accused in Sessions Case No. 86 of 2018, as the complainant and witnesses were untraceable and the case was withdrawn. The court permitted the case to be reopened if the complainant/witnesses are subsequently found, and disposed of the criminal revision application as the matter had become infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts