RAMVACHAN DUKHAN CHANDRAVANSHI (LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED RANGUKUMAR RAMVACHAN CHANDRAVANSHI) vs RAMDAYAL BHURALAL NINA Advocate - null( — FA/2197/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act-1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240152972026
Filing Number
FA/6325/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
FA/2197/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand Tyagi
Coram
Honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand Tyagi
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
285-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 ( 285 )
Sub-Category
2082-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 - COMPENSATION - UNDER SECTION - 166 - FATAL ( 2082 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMVACHAN DUKHAN CHANDRAVANSHI (LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED RANGUKUMAR RAMVACHAN CHANDRAVANSHI)
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
-
2.SONADEVI RAMVACHAN CHANDRAVANSHI
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMDAYAL BHURALAL NINA Advocate - null(
-
2.PROPRIETOR OF ABHA ROAD LINES, DHRUV VARSANIYA
-
3.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. MANDEEP SINGH SALUJA(
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen,honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand TyagiView PDF
Case Summary: FA/2197/2026 Court: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Date: 08/06/2026 The First Appeal filed by the legal heirs of deceased Rangukumar Ramvachan Chandravanshi against Ramdayal Bhuralal Nina and others (including The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) was admitted. Respondent No. 3's counsel accepted notice and waived service of the admission notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand Tyagi
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FA/2197/2026
Case Summary: FA/2197/2026 Court: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Date: 08/06/2026 The First Appeal filed by the legal heirs of deceased Rangukumar Ramvachan Chandravanshi against Ramdayal Bhuralal Nina and others (including The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) was admitted. Respondent No. 3's counsel accepted notice and waived service of the admission notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts