NARPATSINH GAMBHIRSINH BARAD vs PARMAR PRAVINSINH VAJESINH Advocate - null( — FA/2183/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act-1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240146142026
Filing Number
FA/6088/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
FA/2183/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand Tyagi
Coram
Honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand Tyagi
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
285-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 ( 285 )
Sub-Category
2082-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 - COMPENSATION - UNDER SECTION - 166 - FATAL ( 2082 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARPATSINH GAMBHIRSINH BARAD
Adv. KAASH K THAKKAR(
-
2.,MR KK THAKKAR(
-
3.,MR KK THAKKAR(
-
4., ,MR KK THAKKAR(
-
5.VINABA NARPATSINH BARAD
Adv. KAASH K THAKKAR(
-
6.,MR KK THAKKAR(
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARMAR PRAVINSINH VAJESINH Advocate - null(
-
2.HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
-
3.BARAD MAHINDRASINH MULSINH
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen,honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand TyagiView PDF
Case Summary: FA/2183/2026 In First Appeal No. 2183 of 2026 before the Gujarat High Court, Justice Mool Chand Tyagi issued an oral order on 08/06/2026 admitting the appeal filed by Narpatsinh Gambhirsinh Barad and another against Parmar Pravinsinh Vajesinh and others. The court's order to "Admit" means the appeal has been accepted for consideration on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr.justice Mool Chand Tyagi
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FA/2183/2026
Case Summary: FA/2183/2026 In First Appeal No. 2183 of 2026 before the Gujarat High Court, Justice Mool Chand Tyagi issued an oral order on 08/06/2026 admitting the appeal filed by Narpatsinh Gambhirsinh Barad and another against Parmar Pravinsinh Vajesinh and others. The court's order to "Admit" means the appeal has been accepted for consideration on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts