M/S.CHETAN ALLOYS THROUGH SURESH BANSILAL MAHESHWARI vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI( — SCA /4112/2026
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 00. Disposed: --28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GJHC240143742026
Filing Number
SCA /5972/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
SCA /4112/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
56-DB - TAX MATTERS - CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 ( 56 )
Sub-Category
913-DB - TAX MATTERS - CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 913 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S.CHETAN ALLOYS THROUGH SURESH BANSILAL MAHESHWARI
Adv. MR PARESH V SHETH(
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(
CHAIRMAN - GST COUNCIL
Adv. DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
,DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX
Adv. DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CGST
Adv. DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CGST DIVISION - JAMNAGAR - 1
Adv. DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
529-FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS | |
| 24-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS | |
| 01-04-2026 | 529-FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected M/S. Chetan Alloys' writ petition, finding that the petitioner's claim of not receiving hearing notices was false and incorrect. The court determined from the original file that hearing dates were communicated via emails on three occasions and speed posts, though the petitioner failed to update their address on the portal. Liberty was reserved for the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected M/S. Chetan Alloys' writ petition, finding that the petitioner's claim of not receiving hearing notices was false and incorrect. The court determined from the original file that hearing dates were communicated via emails on three occasions and speed posts, though the petitioner failed to update their address on the portal. Liberty was reserved for the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts