ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. vs LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED NARENDRASINH PRABHATSINH CHAUHAN @ BARIA Advocate - null( — MCA /542/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 00. Disposed: --28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE on 24th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240142052026
Filing Number
MCA /5925/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
MCA /542/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
513-SJ - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 ( 513 )
Sub-Category
1564-SJ - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 - RECALL ( 1564 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO.
Adv. MR DHAIRYAWAN D BHATT(
Respondent(s)
LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED NARENDRASINH PRABHATSINH CHAUHAN @ BARIA Advocate - null(
1.
MADHUBEN W/O NARENDRASINH BARIA
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
1.
JAYDIPSINH NARENDRAISNH BARIA
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
1.
PRADIPSINH NARENDRASINH BARIA
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
1.
SUBAKSINH NARENDRASINH BARIA
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
1.
PRUTHVISINH NARENDRASINH BARIA
Adv. NISHIT A BHALODI(
HIMMATSINH DHIRSINH BARIA
CHHAGANBHAI KALABHAI BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
The Gujarat High Court rejected ICICI Lombard General Insurance's recall application because the cross-objection was not filed within the prescribed time period. The court held that a cross-objection constitutes an independent appeal, and the applicant's proper remedy is to file a regular appeal, which remains available to them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court rejected ICICI Lombard General Insurance's recall application because the cross-objection was not filed within the prescribed time period. The court held that a cross-objection constitutes an independent appeal, and the applicant's proper remedy is to file a regular appeal, which remains available to them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts